<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Bead on Enhanced Infrared Heating Plus</title>
		<link>http://ir-heat-plus.com/en/tags/bead/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Bead on Enhanced Infrared Heating Plus</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:49:38 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="http://ir-heat-plus.com/en/tags/bead/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Glass bead annealing heater</title>
				<link>http://ir-heat-plus.com/en/posts/reducing-operational-costs-in-glass-bead-annealing-via-shortwave-infrared-heating/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 05:49:38 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid>http://ir-heat-plus.com/en/posts/reducing-operational-costs-in-glass-bead-annealing-via-shortwave-infrared-heating/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;http://ir-heat-plus.com/images/2bad5999f7b19d5c4829fec6cfc866a1.png&#34; alt=&#34;Glass bead annealing heater&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h1 id=&#34;stopping-the-energy-leak-in-glass-bead-annealing&#34;&gt;Stopping the Energy Leak in Glass Bead Annealing&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Let’s be honest: annealing is usually the biggest power hog on the production line. If you&amp;rsquo;re still using traditional resistive heating, you&amp;rsquo;re basically paying to heat the air around the beads rather than the beads themselves. It&amp;rsquo;s a waste.&#xA;We do &lt;a href=&#34;https://o-yate.net&#34;&gt;things&lt;/a&gt; differently. We use shortwave infrared (IR) lamps that hit the glass directly. It cuts down the warm-up time and, more importantly, keeps your electricity bill from skyrocketing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
